I don’t know. I don’t blog for months, then I read the local paper and feel compelled to write twice in one day. I’ve just completed the consultation document published by SADC on plans for what the City should look like in the future: where/where not we should build; transport needs; and so on.
I’d encourage you to do the same: the plan is here (PDF), and the consultation document is here. I felt like writing the blog because the consultation errs on the side of being brief, but wrongly so in my opinion. Too few questions (at least one of which is bordering on incomprehensible*), and a maximum of 50 words are allowed for AOB. Yes, 50 words. I’ve spent much of the last 6 months talking about the Big Society, localism, community engagement and so on. Much is about how we involve communities in decision making, a good thing. The length of this consultation, together with a very short deadline (too short, according to one councillor) suggests to me that SADC dont really want to know what I think. And knowing a few officers and members, I don’t think that’s true.
I’ll blog again on what I think should be in the strategy, but in the meantime this touched a nerve: I’m prepared to get engaged in my community, as are others. You need people like us. So please try a bit harder to involve us in a way that doesnt discourage us.
*PS: this was the question I found incomprehensible: To what extent do you support the concept ‘Where educational establishments in the Green Belt can demonstrate a real need to provide improved facilities and to expand, should future housing growth at these locations be considered, as enabling development to provide the educational improvements’?





